The Washington Post recently printed an article about the interaction between military robots and their human operators. You can find it here.
Interesting reading, a mix of sad and funny. I’m particularly taken with the tale of the soldier who took “his” robot fishing, and could picture the scene when another returned to base with a box containing the remains of the robot. But this isn’t just a case of people doing strange things under stress.
Think about your car, your computer, your boat, indeed anything else complex that you own. Have you ever felt that it seems to have a soul? I suspect most of us have. It’s a basic human urge to interpret the behaviour of a machine as a show of emotion. Add a little stress, which can be as light as attempting to cross an unfamiliar city at a busy time, and you rapidly find yourself thinking of your car or bike as having personality. Certainly I refer to my car as “she”. You’ll probably find that most men do. If anyone complains I point out that all ships are female, so why not refer to a car in the same way?
There is no way in which a car can be capable of emotion. But try telling yourself that after it apparently found an extra few bhp from nowhere and enabled you to avoid getting hit by that truck. Or why it feels far livelier on a holiday trip than on the daily commute. Or how it managed to outpace something far newer and more powerful. It’s undoubtedly due to your experience of the car but that doesn’t change the fact that you’ve formed an emotional bond.
This is probably not a bad thing. Think about it, are you likely to scrap something that you feel emotion for before its time is up? Are you likely to scrap it at all? You’re more likely to repair rather than replace, and that’s a good thing for the world as a whole. It uses far fewer resources to make a few spares than to make a complete new widget.
